BMW R Nine T

It’s already been a few weeks now since I’ve taken this baby out for a spin, but I still wanted to write it up in a post of it’s own.

I’ve only ever owned a Suzuki M800, and only a few times have I swapped bikes with colleagues or friends. So this won’t be an expert comparison review on the BMW R Nine T, but just my personal experience.
I’ve always thought that the next bike I’d buy would be a Harley Davidson Breakout, or a Night Rod Special, but I might have to step down from that. This R Nine T is just amazing. It looks great, it rides fantastic. There is A LOT of power at low rpm, and still you feel you are in absolute control. The few times I’ve ridden other motorcycles, it took me a while to adjust to the power curve, either I kept stalling it because I didn’t rev it up high enough, or I had troubles with selecting the correct gear. Not with this one, the power is there from the low rpm, all the way up to the highs, which gives for a very comfortable feeling.
The little tug to the right the bike give you when you rev it up at standstill, because of the boxer motor and shaft drive, I was warned about before I got on. I was a bit surprised that it was this pronounced, but it’s not noticeable when riding. It’s just a great feeling to have.
The one thing that did strike me odd was that it felt amazing heavy to steer around tight corners. I’m used to my M800 being very light around the corners, although a lot of people assume it must feel really heavy, just because the bike looks heavy. I guess that I’ve been using all counter steering on the Suzuki, the handlebars are very wide, giving me a big lever to push against. So with minimal effort to guide her through the bends. Now with the R Nine T, that kind of steering was a lot harder. I guess that I should lean into the curve more on a bike like that, something that doesn’t have any (or just a little) effect on the Suzuki. I’ll have it to give it another try sometime next year, when the motorcycle season starts again.

OpenStack Part 3: DevStack

I’ve been trying DevStack on Ubuntu and Debian, just to get a feel with what an OpenStack installation would require from a VM (diskspace and the like).

Lessons learned:

  • Use static ip addresses on your VMs, changing them later on means updating all the entries in the database that contain this IP address.
  • One does not simple reboot a devstack machine! Before the reboot: unstack.sh, reboot, afterwards rejoin-stack.sh. Even though, most of the times the cinder volume service doesn’t seem to come back online after the rejoin-stack, and I’ll have to run stack.sh to make it work again. I’m not sure whether this is side effect of the devstack installation or whether this is an openstack thing, I would’ve hoped that starting and stopping virtual machines with the properly configured services would just register themselves automatically. (Update: it appears that the openstack services under the devstack tool are started in a screen session, so that yet another tool I need to learn to master if I want to progress in investigating this implementation further. But it does imply that this reboot behavior is not indicative of openstack, but only of devstack.)
  • I still have a lot to learn about what all these things actually are. The dashboard isn’t really making it any easier…

Openstack

OpenStack Part 2: Virtual machines

OpenStack is a Cloud Framework, it doesn’t define the system, it is just a collection of cloud tools that integrate together into whatever cloud system you need. As the OpenStack Architecture Design Guide suggests, there are a multitude of possibilities.

My idea is to go through that list one by one, unlocking more services and growing my little cloud as I go further. First up is a general purpose cloud. This includes the most basic OpenStack components, and should allow me to launch virtual machines, configure some basic networking, file and object storage, etc. This is basically an IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) model.

At this point my idea is to run OpenStack in different VMs on my physical machine. This way, if something goes wrong and I mess up the installation too much, I can just restore a VM and start over. Additionally I can also create compute nodes at will (as far as the HW will allow it).
This means I’m going to need nested KVMs.
This short guide told me how to enable it. More information can be found here.

This is what you need to end up with:
$ cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested
Y

Creating virtual machines: https://wiki.debian.org/KVM
$ sudo apt-get install qemu-kvm libvirt-bin
$ sudo adduser panic1 kvm
$ sudo adduser panic1 libvirtd
$ echo "LIBVIRT_DEFAULT_URI=\"qemu:///system\"" >> .profile
$ sudo vim /etc/default/libvirt-guests

From this point forward I used the virt-manager application to create a VM (make sure you select to copy the host cpu information), and install a minimal debian or ubuntu on it. Repeat the same steps needed to enable nested VMs.

The same can ofcourse be achieved just the same with VMs in VirtualBox, running on a Windows machine.

OpenStack Part 1: Installing Debian on a RAID volume

For a quite a while I’ve had an old desktop machine gathering dust in a corner. It hasn’t been powered up in about a year, and I’ve even been thinking about what I could still do with it. The machine itself is still quite capable, it has a first generation core i7 CPU at 2.8GHz, and 4GB of RAM.
And recently a new option presented itself, my employer is starting up self-study gatherings and knowledge sharing sessions about “Cloud”. They’ve been doing these kinds of knowledge sharing gatherings for everything Linux Kernel for quite a while, the quadcopter was a project that I’ve started in light of that Linux Kernel knowledge sharing.
For this Cloud knowledge sharing I was thinking to set up OpenStack on this desktop machine. I ordered some more RAM, and a couple of SSDs to upgrade the machine so it can handle a few virtual machines.

There are couple of options when it comes to virualization, there are hypervisors like Hyper-V from Microsoft, ESXi from VMWare, XEN from Citrix, and there are virtualization tools like Qemu, KVM, VirtualBox, VMWare Player. From all this, only two options that are free, open source, and perfectly supported by OpenStack, stand out: Xen and KVM. Qemu fits into those requirements too, but this is an emulator, and performance is quite low, but fun can be had with this for very specific purposes later. I’ve decided to go with KVM running of off Debian, just because…

So there I go, installing Debian. I’ve configured the BIOS of my desktop to create a RAID0 volume with the two SSDs I bought, and followed this guide.
It took me alot longer than it should’ve but eventually it worked when I just put everything in one partition, without LVM (I didn’t know what it was at first).

I wasn’t too happy with this, I really like the idea of having my /home folder in a separate partition. And I’ve been reading up on this LVM thing, and this seemed like something that could come in really handy. LVM creates a layer on top of physical disks/partitions: a volume group. The volume group can be dynamically extended or reduced at will. Within that volume group you can create logical volumes, which are also easily extended/reduced. Within such a logical volume you typically have your favorite file system.

OK, now things start getting hairy, when setting up those LVM volumes during the Debian install everything that guide says still seems to apply. After that rescue step to install Grub, I reboot the machine. Grub comes up, Debian starts to boot, but ends up in an emergency mode:
Welcome to emergency mode! After logging in, type "journalctl -xb" to view system logs
The logs says something like:
debian systemd[222]: Failed at step EXEC spawning /bin/plymouth: No such file or directory

Plymouth seems to have nothing to do with the error here, plowing through the logs I noticed that all the disk checks on those LVM partitions are failing, and I believe this is more likely the cause, but I haven’t investigated this any further.

I came across this link instead. I reverted the RAID configuration in the BIOS, and I went with the software RAID option instead. This worked, Debian boots up completely, I have RAID, LVM.

But I used the guided partitioning from the Debian installer, the /home partition was 470GB large because of this, and I’d rather have a separate partition for the images and instances for the virtual machines I’ll be setting up next. But resizing a logical volume does require that the volume is not used (it’s file system mounted), and unmounting a filesystem is only possible when it’s not in use by anything or anyone.

Crtl-Alt F1 gets you in a terminal, log in with your user credentials:
$ pwd
/home/panic1
Normally when you are logging in as a user, the current working directory for the shell is your home dir
$ cd /
This changes the current working dir of the shell
$ sudo su
Become root
# systemctl isolate multi-user.target
This kills off the complete graphical desktop and all applications within
# fuser /home
Shows you which users are still using /home. Should return empty
# lsof /home
Lists open files. Should return empty
# umount /home
With no open files, /home can be unmounted
# lvreduce -L 100G -r /dev/PANICLOUD-vg/home
Resize the home volume and the filesystem to 100GB
# lvcreate -n images -L 100GB PANICLOUD-vg
Create new “images” logical volume
# lvcreate -n instances -L 100GB PANICLOUD-vg
Create new “instances” logical volume
# systemctl isolate default.target
This will start the graphical desktop again

Within the graphical desktop I used the Disks utility to format and mount the volumes to /opt/images and /opt/instances respectively.

Quadcopter part 8: I2C

For the quadcopter I bought a GY-80 arduino compatible 10 DOF (degrees of freedom) sensor IMU. The small board comes with an accelerometer, a gyroscope, a magnetometer, and a pressure sensor. For now I only need the accelerometer and the gyroscope, and this post deals with connecting the sensor board to the beaglebone back and reading out the results by using the BlackLib library.

First some specifications on the sensor board:

  • 3 Axis Gyro
    • ST Microelectronics L3G4200D
    • Address: 0x69
    • Datasheet
  • 3 Axis Accelerometer
    • Analog Devices ADXL345
    • Address: 0x53
    • Datasheet
  • 3 Axis Magnetometer
  • Barometer + Thermometer

Connecting the sensors to the beaglebone black is very straightforward. The sensor board supports both 5V and 3.3V power, and in case of the beaglebone al the I2C lines are 3.3V logic levels, I decided to power the sensors with the 3.3V.

To connect the SDA and SCL lines to the beaglebone black board, you need to realise that the beaglebone comes with 3 I2C busses. Only I2C bus 0 and 1 are by default enabled, and used by the system, the third one can be turned on by using the device tree overlays. But I2C bus 0 isn’t exported to the expansion headers so I will have to use I2C bus 1, on expansion header P9, pins 19 and 20, since these are by default enabled, no additional configuration was required.

When powering up the board:

root@beaglebone:~# i2cdetect -y -r 1
0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f
00:          -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
10: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1e --
20: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
30: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
40: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
50: -- -- -- 53 UU UU UU UU -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
60: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 69 -- -- -- -- -- --
70: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 77

With the BlackLib library, reading out the sensor data was fairly easy. Sources can be found on my github.

With this final hardware installed on the quadcopter, the assembly has been completed!
wpid-wp-1425224103231.jpeg

Quadcopter part 7: C++ Programming with BlackLib

[UPDATE]: this was on kernel version 3.8.  I’ve started over on kernel version 4.4, and since the PWM code in BlackLib (v2 and v3) aren’t working with 4.4, I’ve decided to do the implementation myself.  All the C++11 options, dialects, etc can be removed from the eclipse project settings.
BlackLib v3 does have a nice Makefile now, so building and using it doesn’t require you to set up a seperate project in eclipse anymore, you just need to specify the include path and the library path.

First you’ll need the cross compiler. For example, on Ubuntu:
sudo apt-get install gcc-arm-linux-gnueabihf

This will give you:
nicky@nicky-Precision-M4800:~/Projects/BlackLib$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++ --version
arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.9.1-16ubuntu6) 4.9.1
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

nicky@nicky-Precision-M4800:~/Projects/BlackLib$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc –version
arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.9.1-16ubuntu6) 4.9.1
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

However it seems that this version is a bit more recent then the one BlackLib has been developed with, and it won’t compile due to a few missing includes. You can find this fix on my github repo: https://github.com/panic1/BlackLib/tree/unistd

Now I will be using eclipse to build a shared library from this BlackLib code, in my setup I’m using Eclipse Luna with CDT.

  1. Create a new C++ Project, Click next.
  2. Project name: BlackLib
  3. Uncheck default location, and select the location where you checked out the BlackLib code
  4. Select Shared Library, Empty Project
  5. Select cross toolchain (you might need to uncheck the checkmark at the bottom to show all toolchain options), and click next
  6. The toolchain prefix: arm-linux-gnueabihf-. Click finish

Now the fun starts, BlackLib is written with quite advanced C++11 functionality, and the compiler will have to be enable to allow these experimental features:

  1. Right click on the project, select Properties
  2. Go to C/C++ Build, Settings
  3. In the Cross Settings the prefix should be set to arm-linux-gnueabihf- (just in case you’ve forgotten in a previous step
  4. In the Cross C++ Compiler, Dialect, Language standard should be set to ISO C++11
  5. In the Cross C++ Compiler, Preprocessor, add a new symbol __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
  6. In the Cross C++ Compiler, Miscellaneous, check the Position Independent Code (-fPIC)
  7. Apply

As we don’t need them in the resulting library, in the project you can right click, go to Resource Configuration, and Exclude from Build the following folders:

  • SPI_SETUP
  • V1_0
  • V2_0/SPI_SETUP
  • V2_0/exampleAndTiming
  • exampleAndTiming.cpp

Now go ahead and build the project, this should result in a libBlackLib.so file we’ll start to use in the next steps.

Using the library in a new project is pretty straight forward:

Create a new C++ project in Eclipse, choose Empty Project and the Cross GCC toolchain, and click next. The toolchain prefix should be arm-linux-gnueabihf-, just like before.

Right click the project, and go to Properties, Project References and select the BlackLib project to be referenced.
Go to C/C++ Build, Settings, and add the path to the BlackLib/v2.0 folder Cross G++ Compiler Includes, and Cross G++ Linker Libraries should include the BlackLib library, and the path to the BlackLib/Debug where the libBlackLib.so file can be found.

To run your application on the Beaglebone board, you will first have to copy the libBlackLib.so file. There are several valid locations where Linux searches for shared libraries, I usually put it in /usr/lib/. Then copy your application binary, location doesn’t really matter, for example /root or /home/debian, make the binary executable (chmod), and run it.

Quadcopter part 6: PWM

[Update] This was on kernel version 3.8.  It had to be completely redone when I performed an upstep to version 4.4.  I will put my findings in a separate post.

I’ve been working on this for a very long time. It was the first time I came into contact with Device Trees in the Linux kernel, and that was a steep learning curve all in its own right, but I also came across a lot technical difficulties and bugs in the beaglebone pwm driver code. Those definitely didn’t help. Here’s the story of enabling 4 PWM pins to do what I want…

Verifying that the PWM output can drive the Turnigy ESCs

The first experiment I wanted to do was to check whether the beaglebone PWM outputs can drive the Turnigy speed controllers. My worry was that the 3.3V PWM signal wouldn’t be enough to drive the 5V controllers.
So I used this guide to control a single (note: single, this will be important later…) PWM output. It was easy to set the period and duty cycle, I verified the timings on the oscilloscope, looking good. I hooked it up to a speed controller, and sure enough: nothing happened. The engine kept beeping happily (it’s an alarm indicating invalid input signal).

Before looking up and ordering a logic level shifter, or designing a transistor inverter circuit to boost the 3.3V to a 5V signal, I decided to give it a try with an Arduino board I had laying around. The Arduino has 5V PWM outputs. Hooking up the beaglebone, the Arduino and the ESCs, I thought it was a good idea to also connnect the grounds for all the devices together, just in case. It worked, the propeller spinning happily on all four engines. I corrected the direction of those propellors that were spinning backwards. In a last attempt I decided to give the beaglebone board just one more try, now that the grounds are all connected together. And that worked too!! Lesson learned: connect ground! Second lesson learned: don’t leave the propeller on the engine when doing tests, I had one of those props fly up to my face when I accidentally set the signal to full power. A quick calculation about the speed that prop reached at full rotational speed, encouraged me to be more careful (I would be stupid to ignore a sharp plastic blade flinging itself around at 500km/h).

Device tree files

To activate the PWM outputs, so that they can be controller from a C++ application, I needed to get to know the device tree overlays. Since the 3.8 kernel Torvalds disallowed the use of platform support code that was quickly flooding the kernel kernel sources. Device trees were to be used instead.
A device tree is a flat file detailing the entire hardware, were all the peripherals are located, which drivers to load, etc, etc…

In order to have some flexibility they are using device tree overlays that can be added on top of a base configuration.

In case of the beaglebone black board, these is a cape manager that can load these device tree overlays at runtime, and the debian image I installed on the beaglebone comes equipped with a full set of example precompiled overlays in /lib/firmware.

In order to load the PWM pins for the quadcopter we need to:
root@beaglebone:/lib/firmware# echo am33xx_pwm > /sys/devices/bone_capemgr.9/slots
root@beaglebone:/lib/firmware# echo bone_pwm_P8_13 > /sys/devices/bone_capemgr.9/slots
root@beaglebone:/lib/firmware# echo bone_pwm_P8_19 > /sys/devices/bone_capemgr.9/slots
root@beaglebone:/lib/firmware# echo bone_pwm_P9_14 > /sys/devices/bone_capemgr.9/slots
root@beaglebone:/lib/firmware# echo bone_pwm_P9_16 > /sys/devices/bone_capemgr.9/slots

and verify with:
cat /sys/devices/bone_capemgr.9/slots
Should return:
0: 54:PF---
1: 55:PF---
2: 56:PF---
3: 57:PF---
4: ff:P-O-L Bone-LT-eMMC-2G,00A0,Texas Instrument,BB-BONE-EMMC-2G
5: ff:P-O-L Bone-Black-HDMI,00A0,Texas Instrument,BB-BONELT-HDMI
8: ff:P-O-L Override Board Name,00A0,Override Manuf,am33xx_pwm
9: ff:P-O-L Override Board Name,00A0,Override Manuf,bone_pwm_P8_13
10: ff:P-O-L Override Board Name,00A0,Override Manuf,bone_pwm_P8_19
11: ff:P-O-L Override Board Name,00A0,Override Manuf,bone_pwm_P9_14
12: ff:P-O-L Override Board Name,00A0,Override Manuf,bone_pwm_P9_16

Or do automatic at bootup by modifying /boot/uboot/uEnv.txt
Add this to the bootargs (in my example I edited a line in the “Example” section):
cape_enable=capemgr.enable_partno=am33xx_pwm,bone_pwm_P8_13,bone_pwm_P8_19,bone_pwm_P9_14,bone_pwm_P9_16

Running into problems

In part 7 I’m explaining how to control the PWM outputs from a C++ application. But during this development I quickly ran into issues. I could control the duty cycle just fine, but the period was always set to 500µs, and couldn’t be changed because INVALID PARAM… It worked just fine with the python script just before.

I checked the code behind the python library, and compared it to the code in the BlackLic C++ library, but the implementation was the same. The pins were controlled by writing to set of files in /sys/devices/ocp3/pwm_test_P8_13.14/. Trying to write 20000000 into the period file will keep failing.

Hunting around the web I quickly found other people encountering the same issue. The PWM on the beaglebone is implemented on three distinct chips. Each of those chips have 2 ehrpwm (enhanced resolution) outputs. The period can only be managed on a per chip basis, and has to be the same for both outputs. However, the beaglebone pwm_test driver exposes both outputs separately, and asserts that any new configuration you want to apply to an output has to be same as the other (chicken or egg?). Maybe it is possible to disable both outputs, change the periods, and enable them again, I haven’t looked into that in greater detail.

The prevailing solution on the web would be to patch the pwm_test driver. The period would be set to 0 in the device tree overlay, and the test_pwm driver would interpret this value and not enable the output. That would allow you to change the period after boot. In my case I wasn’t really interested in being able to change the period, I just wanted it set to 20ms. And if the device tree overlays would allow me to do that, I wouldn’t even need the patch.
Source: http://saadahmad.ca/using-pwm-on-the-beaglebone-black/

I found the device tree source files here: https://github.com/beagleboard/devicetree-source
But I discovered later that I could have also decompiled the precompiled dtbo files in the /lib/firmware folder.

I went ahead and changed the period in these files from 500000 to 20000000 (20ms):
root@beaglebone:~/dts# vim bone_pwm_P9_14-00A0.dts
root@beaglebone:~/dts# vim bone_pwm_P9_16-00A0.dts
root@beaglebone:~/dts# vim bone_pwm_P8_13-00A0.dts
root@beaglebone:~/dts# vim bone_pwm_P8_19-00A0.dts

Compile like this:
dtc -O dtb -o bone_pwm_P9_14-00A0.dtbo -b 0 -@ bone_pwm_P9_14-00A0.dts
dtc -O dtb -o bone_pwm_P9_16-00A0.dtbo -b 0 -@ bone_pwm_P9_16-00A0.dts
dtc -O dtb -o bone_pwm_P8_13-00A0.dtbo -b 0 -@ bone_pwm_P8_13-00A0.dts
dtc -O dtb -o bone_pwm_P8_19-00A0.dtbo -b 0 -@ bone_pwm_P8_19-00A0.dts

Copy to the dtbo files, but make sure you backup /lib/firmware first!
cp *.dtbo /lib/firmware

Rebooting the beaglebone, and still not working…. The period was still 500µs.

It took me a whole while before I figured out what was actually happening. During the search I decided to download and recompiled the kernel, just like the original article suggested. However the howto on rebuilding the kernel is not correct for the kernel image in the standard debian image, instead:
git clone https://github.com/RobertCNelson/bb-kernel.git
cd bb-kernel
git checkout 3.8.13-bone50
sudo apt-get install device-tree-compiler lzma lzop u-boot-tools libncurses5-dev:amd64 libncurses5:i38
./build_kernel.sh

In the folder KERNEL/firmware/capes I could find the same dts files and looking through the kernel code, it seemed like these device tree files are compiled and included in a binary blob somewhere in the kernel binary, instead of being read from /lib/firmware like everyone claimed it was.

Anyway…
I shared the bb-kernel folder over samba, so I could mount it on the beaglebone:
mkdir bb-kernel
mount -t cifs //192.168.1.102/bb-kernel ./bb-kernel -o user=nobody

I also had to change a few commands in bb-kernel/tools/local_install.sh:
where you see:
sudo tar xf "${DIR}/deploy/${KERNEL_UTS}-dtbs.tar.gz" -C "${location}/dtbs/"
replace it with:
sudo tar xf "${DIR}/deploy/${KERNEL_UTS}-dtbs.tar.gz" --no-same-owner -C "${location}/dtbs/"

Now run ./tools/local_install.sh on the beaglebone and the new kernel with the adapted device tree files will be installed on the beaglebone.

That did replace the modules folder, and made me lose my mt7601Usta driver for the wireless antenna. Instead of doing the complete local_install, I just copied the zImage I found the bb-kernel/deploy folder over the /boot/uboot/zImage in a clean debian installation. Reboot, and it worked!

Second thought… maybe you are supposed to copy the dts files into a file of your own, adapt as needed and try to push that into /lib/firmware. So I did a few more experiments:

  • Increase the version number (from 00A0 to 00A1), and hope that the system is intelligent enough to load the one with the highest version. It wasn’t
  • Renaming the file, and using the new name. I renamed bone_pwm_P8_13-00A0.dts to panic1_pwm_P8_13-00A0.dts, compiled it, put it in the /lib/firmware folder. And it does work when you echo the new name into the slots file, but the bootloader doesn’t seem to be able to access the files in /lib/firmware, putting the new name in the uEnv.txt file didn’t work.

Quadcopter part 5: Assembly

I finally managed to find some time to assemble the quadcopter. I haven’t got the right standoffs to be able to mount to the beaglebone black controller board onto the frame yet, but those should arrive in the mail pretty soon, so for now the quadcopter is still going nowhere.

wpid-wp-1416704155024.jpeg

The next part will be about controlling the PWM output, reading in the sensor data and assembling everything on the prototyping cape. I made a quick drawing, but I still need to experiment and see whether these circuits will work.

HardwareDrawing_bb

Collection of guitars

Here I would like to share a picture of the guitars here at home. So from left to right: the ESP LTD EC-1000 ASB, the Jackson RRTMG and the ESP LTD KH-602. The amplifier is a Peavey Vypyr 30 with the Sampera2 foot switch.

image

Quadcopter part 3.3: Wireless (finally)

Those LogiLink wireless dongles were going nowhere fast, I gave one to a colleague of mine, maybe he has a bit more luck with it. So I decided to count my losses and go with one of those USB wireless interfaces listed on the beaglebone site, and I ordered the UWN200 from Logic Supply. I reverted my beaglebone board to the standard debian image, because I wanted to start afresh and the module worked straight out the package, just like that. The interface is now called ra0 instead of wlan0, but that was not totally unexpected.

The big antenna is also an added bonus, as I expect it to have a longer range for the quadcopter. But reading up on the internet, I do expect that running this as an access point is not possible with the current ralink driver. I will have to find a different solution for that, maybe I’ll set up a wireless AP on my laptop instead.

I measured a 100s average of 24.5MBits/s with iperf, which is just wonderful!